(EU) No 7372014
|
ID： |
8305E76E93E94950A5A3680F5E77C178 |
|
文件大小(MB)： |
0.46 |
|
页数： |
63 |
|
文件格式： |
|
|
日期： |
2014-7-11 |
|
购买： |
文本摘录（文本识别可能有误，但文件阅览显示及打印正常，pdf文件可进行文字搜索定位）：
II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 737/2014 of 24 June 2014 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for 2-phenylphenol, chlormequat, cyflufenamid, cyfluthrin, dicamba, fluopicolide, flutriafol, fosetyl, indoxacarb, isoprothiolane, mandipropamid, metaldehyde, metconazole, phosmet, picloram, propyzamide, pyriproxyfen, saflufenacil, spinosad and trifloxystrobin in or on certain products (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (1), and in particular Article 14(1)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1)For 2-phenylphenol, indoxacarb and metconazole maximum residue levels (MRLs) were set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. For chlormequat, cyfluthrin, propyzamide and trifloxystrobin MRLs were set in Annex II and Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. For cyflufenamid, dicamba, fluopicolide, flutriafol, fosetyl, isoprothiolane, mandipropamid, metaldehyde, phosmet, picloram, pyriproxyfen and spinosad MRLs were set in Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. As regards saflufenacil, no specific MRLs were set nor was the substance included in Annex IV to that Regulation, so the default value of 0,01 mg/kg laid down in Article 18(1)(b) of that Regulation applies. (2) In the context of a procedure for the authorisation of the use of a plant protection product containing the active substance chlormequat on pears, cereals and products of animal origin, an application was submitted in accordance with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for modification of the existing MRLs. (3) As regards cyflufenamid, such an application was made for strawberries and peppers. As regards cyfluthrin, such an application was made for artichokes. As regards dicamba, such an application was made for herbs and herbal infusions (leaves and flowers). As regards fluopicolide, such an application was made for hops. As regards fosetyl, such an application was made for kiwi, potatoes and spices. As regards indoxacarb, such an application was made for beans (with pods) and mustard seed. As regards mandipropamid, such an application was made for tomatoes. As regards metaldehyde, such an application was made for beans (fresh and dry) and peas (fresh and dry). As regards metconazole, such an application was made for barley and oats. As regards phosmet, such an application was made for citrus fruit and pome fruit. As regards picloram, such an application was made for rape seed and mustard seed. As regards propyzamide, such an application was made for herbal infusions (leaves, flowers and roots). As regards spinosad, such an application was made for small fruit and berries of code number 0154000 and products of animal origin. As regards trifloxystrobin, such an application was made for horseradish, parsley root and purslane. (4)In accordance with Article 6(2) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 an application was submitted for saflufenacil on oranges, lemons, grapefruit, almond, pecan nuts, apples, pears, peaches, plums, cherries, grapes, banana, 10.7.2014 L 202/1 Official Journal of the European Union EN (1)OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1.,mango, potatoes, legume vegetables, sweet corn, maize, wheat, rice, barley, oat, rye, sorghum, millet, sugar cane, dry peas, dry beans, soya bean, sunflower seed, cotton seed and coffee beans. The applicant claims that the authorised use of that substance on such crops in Latin America, the United States and Canada leads to residues exceeding the MRLs in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and that higher MRLs are necessary to avoid trade barriers for the importation of those crops. (5) Such applications were also submitted as regards fluopicolide on root and tuber vegetables and as regards flutriafol on pome fruits, cherries, peaches and plums. In both cases the applicants claim that the authorised use of those substances on such crops in the United States leads to residues exceeding the MRLs in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and that higher MRLs are necessary to avoid trade barriers for the importation of those crops. As regards pyriproxyfen, such an application was made for stone fruits and tea. The applicant claims that the authorised use of that substance on such crops in the United States and Japan leads to residues exceed……
……